# 0x Protocol Security Council

**URL:** <https://forum.0xprotocol.org/t/0x-protocol-security-council/3528>\
**Category:** 🏛 Governance\
**Created:** [March 17, 2023, 6:44pm UTC](https://forum.0xprotocol.org/t/0x-protocol-security-council/3528 "2023-03-17T18:44:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ericwong](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.0xprotocol.org/ericwong/32/1126_2.png) [@ericwong](https://forum.0xprotocol.org/u/ericwong)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2023, 5:59pm UTC](https://forum.0xprotocol.org/t/0x-protocol-security-council/3528/7 "2023-03-27T17:59:44Z")

</div>

If I’m understanding the question properly of how do we make sure that members of the security council sufficiently knows the whole architecture of 0x Protocol to be able to serve the role, I think that’s where the open application and voting process should step in as a good filter.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.0xprotocol.org/t/0x-protocol-security-council/3528)._