that’s about right @Craig_Braun_Fractal, and this is in the context of 0x API integrations. It’s important to distinguish between integrations that have their own order routing (1Inch, Paraswap) VS integrations where the 0x API order routing is used (Zerion). The simulation above is directly relevant in the context of the latter, and can only be inferred in the context of the former (as we simulated the behavior of 0x API, but we don’t have visibility on other aggregators order routing).
Having said so, we need to consider that the DEX ecosystem is growing and evolving aggressively. With these variables are in play, it’s difficult to isolate environments and make predictions (even with public blockchains!). Marginal competitive advantages can produce disruptive swings in adoption.
Finally (and related to the point above) these parameters are upgradable, and can be changed in the future pretty easily. We believe there is value in adopting a ‘test-and-iterate’ approach with this, to gather more data in the wild to make better informed decisions later.